Artificial intelligence (AI) writing tools, such as ChatGPT, Gemini, and Claude, have become extremely popular. They can create emails, write marketing content, and debug code quickly. Many people think these tools could replace traditional editing tools. A spell checker, once a key part of word processors, might seem unnecessary now that AI can rewrite a paragraph with correct grammar and style.
It would be a mistake to get rid of human-verified editing tools. Current AI services are strong suggestion engines, but they are not always correct or truthful. If you rely only on AI for accuracy, you could make significant errors that a basic spell checker would easily catch.
The Problem with “Hallucinations”
A main issue with current AI models is “hallucination.” AI predicts the most likely next word in a sequence. This usually results in fluent, relevant text. However, when the model lacks information or the prompt is unclear, it creates believable-sounding falsehoods.
A standard spell checker checks if a word is in the dictionary and used correctly. An AI might “correct” a technical term to a common synonym, which changes the meaning of a sentence. It might make up statistics, quote sources that do not exist, or include names of people who were not involved in an event. These errors often sound correct but are factually wrong.
Context is Key (and AI Can Miss It)
Consider a business communication where a specific internal acronym is vital. A traditional spell checker might flag the acronym but offers the simple option to “Add to Dictionary.” An AI, trained on large public datasets, might try to “fix” that unique term with a generic, incorrect replacement because it’s unfamiliar with a specific context.
AI also struggles with nuance, tone, and the legal or compliance requirements of specific industries. A human editor or a dedicated, rule-based editing suite understands the fixed rules of internal policy or legal jargon.
A Powerful Partnership, Not a Replacement
AI is a strong first-draft generator and brainstorming partner. It speeds up the creative process and helps with writer’s block. However, it does not replace the crucial final step of human review and verification.
Use AI as a smart assistant, not the editor-in-chief. Keep traditional spell checkers, grammar tools, and critical thinking skills sharp. The best method in 2025 is not AI instead of spell check; it’s AI plus careful human oversight. Do not get rid of a spell checker; it’s the last defence against convincing, and incorrect AI output.
